What you'll learn
Create robust domain types with constructors, factories, value equality, const instances, and immutable update patterns. The lesson turns the APIs into a repeatable engineering workflow instead of a collection of isolated snippets.
By the end of this lesson, you'll be able to:
- Apply Classes and members in a production-shaped Flutter feature
- Apply Constructors in a production-shaped Flutter feature
- Apply Factories in a production-shaped Flutter feature
- Apply const objects in a production-shaped Flutter feature
Core mental model
Connect each API to the decision it supports. Flutter code stays maintainable when state, ownership, lifecycle, and platform boundaries are explicit.
| Concept | What it means | Decision rule |
|---|---|---|
| Const constructor | Creates values eligible for compile-time canonicalization | Use when every field is final and construction has no runtime work |
| Value equality | Objects compare by meaningful fields rather than identity | Define equality consistently with hashCode for value objects |
| copyWith | Creates a modified value while preserving immutability | Use explicit updates instead of mutating shared state |
Professional workflow
Work in small vertical slices and keep behavior observable from the first iteration.
- Define the immutable lesson-progress model boundary: user goal, inputs, visible states, ownership, and expected failures.
- Build the smallest working vertical slice with typed data and explicit dependencies.
- Represent loading, empty, success, and failure behavior where the feature can encounter them.
- Verify logic away from the UI, then exercise the rendered behavior at its public boundary.
- Inspect lifecycle, accessibility, performance, security, and platform behavior before widening the feature.
- Refactor only after behavior is protected by repeatable evidence.
Protect the frame
Guided Flutter lab
Build a focused immutable lesson-progress model slice
This compact example keeps the important ownership and data-flow decisions visible so the behavior is easy to extend and test.
class LessonProgress {
const LessonProgress({required this.lessonId, this.percent = 0});
final String lessonId;
final int percent;
LessonProgress copyWith({int? percent}) => LessonProgress(
lessonId: lessonId,
percent: percent ?? this.percent,
);
@override
bool operator ==(Object other) =>
other is LessonProgress && other.lessonId == lessonId && other.percent == percent;
@override
int get hashCode => Object.hash(lessonId, percent);
}Production practice
Contract
Define the immutable lesson-progress model inputs, outputs, owner, lifecycle, visible states, and platform assumptions before selecting APIs or packages.
Verification
Protect pure rules with unit tests and the rendered public contract with widget or integration evidence; include one unavailable or failure case.
Operations
Keep dependencies replaceable, log actionable context without user secrets, and measure user-visible behavior before optimizing.
Common failure mode
Independent workshop
Extend the guided lab into a review-ready immutable lesson-progress model feature that fits the running course portfolio app.
Your finished workshop must include:
- Classes and members
- Constructors
- Factories
- const objects
- Equality and hashCode
- Automated verification and a short design note
Definition of done
Recap & quick check
Key takeaways
- Const constructor: Use when every field is final and construction has no runtime work
- Value equality: Define equality consistently with hashCode for value objects
- copyWith: Use explicit updates instead of mutating shared state
Quick check
1. Which rule best applies to Const constructor?
2. Which rule best applies to Value equality?
3. Which rule best applies to copyWith?
Next: Interfaces, Mixins & Class Modifiers