What you'll learn
Separate views, view models, repositories, and services with immutable data, commands, abstract boundaries, and optional use cases. The lesson turns the APIs into a repeatable engineering workflow instead of a collection of isolated snippets.
By the end of this lesson, you'll be able to:
- Apply UI and data layers in a production-shaped Flutter feature
- Apply View and ViewModel in a production-shaped Flutter feature
- Apply Repositories and services in a production-shaped Flutter feature
- Apply Dependency inversion in a production-shaped Flutter feature
Core mental model
Connect each API to the decision it supports. Flutter code stays maintainable when state, ownership, lifecycle, and platform boundaries are explicit.
| Concept | What it means | Decision rule |
|---|---|---|
| UI layer | Views render state and ViewModels own presentation logic | Keep data access and business rules out of widgets |
| Data layer | Repositories coordinate models while services wrap external sources | Expose domain-oriented repository contracts |
| Domain layer | Optional use cases hold complex or repeated business logic | Add only when ViewModels become crowded or logic is reused |
Professional workflow
Work in small vertical slices and keep behavior observable from the first iteration.
- Define the layered course feature boundary: user goal, inputs, visible states, ownership, and expected failures.
- Build the smallest working vertical slice with typed data and explicit dependencies.
- Represent loading, empty, success, and failure behavior where the feature can encounter them.
- Verify logic away from the UI, then exercise the rendered behavior at its public boundary.
- Inspect lifecycle, accessibility, performance, security, and platform behavior before widening the feature.
- Refactor only after behavior is protected by repeatable evidence.
Protect the frame
Guided Flutter lab
Build a focused layered course feature slice
This compact example keeps the important ownership and data-flow decisions visible so the behavior is easy to extend and test.
abstract interface class CourseRepository {
Future<List<Course>> getPublished();
}
class CourseViewModel extends ChangeNotifier {
CourseViewModel(this.repository);
final CourseRepository repository;
CourseViewState state = const CourseViewState.loading();
Future<void> load() async {
state = const CourseViewState.loading();
notifyListeners();
final courses = await repository.getPublished();
state = courses.isEmpty
? const CourseViewState.empty()
: CourseViewState.ready(courses);
notifyListeners();
}
}Production practice
Contract
Define the layered course feature inputs, outputs, owner, lifecycle, visible states, and platform assumptions before selecting APIs or packages.
Verification
Protect pure rules with unit tests and the rendered public contract with widget or integration evidence; include one unavailable or failure case.
Operations
Keep dependencies replaceable, log actionable context without user secrets, and measure user-visible behavior before optimizing.
Common failure mode
Independent workshop
Extend the guided lab into a review-ready layered course feature feature that fits the running course portfolio app.
Your finished workshop must include:
- UI and data layers
- View and ViewModel
- Repositories and services
- Dependency inversion
- Commands
- Automated verification and a short design note
Definition of done
Recap & quick check
Key takeaways
- UI layer: Keep data access and business rules out of widgets
- Data layer: Expose domain-oriented repository contracts
- Domain layer: Add only when ViewModels become crowded or logic is reused
Quick check
1. Which rule best applies to UI layer?
2. Which rule best applies to Data layer?
3. Which rule best applies to Domain layer?
Next: Advanced State Management Patterns