What you'll learn
Plan logical and physical recovery, test restores, monitor workload health, and understand vacuum, analyze, bloat, and routine operations. The lab uses PostgreSQL while identifying the semantics that transfer to other relational systems.
By the end of this lesson, you'll be able to:
- Apply pg_dump and restore to a realistic data question
- Apply Physical backup and WAL to a realistic data question
- Apply RPO and RTO to a realistic data question
- Apply Monitoring to a realistic data question
Core mental model
SQL is declarative: describe the result or invariant you need, then let the database choose a physical execution strategy. Use this table to connect syntax to design decisions.
| Concept | What it means | Decision rule |
|---|---|---|
| RPO | Maximum acceptable data loss measured in time | Choose backup and WAL retention to meet it |
| RTO | Maximum acceptable restoration time | Measure full restore and validation, not only backup duration |
| VACUUM | Reclaims reusable space and supports transaction-ID health | Monitor autovacuum and long transactions rather than running blindly |
Professional workflow
Work from a defined question and result grain, then verify correctness before performance.
- State the recoverable database operation question and the exact grain of the expected result.
- Inspect table definitions, keys, constraints, representative values, and row counts.
- Write the smallest correct query with explicit columns, aliases, and predicates.
- Test missing, duplicate, boundary, and NULL cases before trusting the result.
- Inspect the execution plan or affected rows when cost or data change matters.
- Save the query with its assumptions, parameters, verification, and recovery notes.
Make results explainable
Guided SQL lab
Record restore evidence
Recovery becomes a tested capability when each drill records artifact identity, timing, validation, and gaps.
CREATE TABLE operations.restore_drills (
id bigint GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
backup_reference text NOT NULL,
started_at timestamptz NOT NULL,
completed_at timestamptz,
recovered_to timestamptz,
validation_status text NOT NULL,
findings text
);Production practice
Contract
Define the expected row grain, inputs, output columns, invariants, and failure or empty-result behavior before writing SQL.
Verification
Use representative fixtures and independent row-count, uniqueness, NULL, and boundary checks; compare plans when cost matters.
Operations
Save reviewed SQL with explicit schema names where appropriate, bounded scope, least privilege, observability, and a recovery path for changes.
Common failure mode
Independent workshop
Build a review-ready recoverable database operation lab against the course commerce dataset.
Your finished workshop must include:
- pg_dump and restore
- Physical backup and WAL
- RPO and RTO
- Monitoring
- VACUUM and ANALYZE
- Verification notes and edge-case evidence
Definition of done
Recap & quick check
Key takeaways
- RPO: Choose backup and WAL retention to meet it
- RTO: Measure full restore and validation, not only backup duration
- VACUUM: Monitor autovacuum and long transactions rather than running blindly
Quick check
1. Which rule best applies to RPO?
2. Which rule best applies to RTO?
3. Which rule best applies to VACUUM?
Next: SQL from Applications & Prepared Statements